The idea behind may be that psychologists deal with individuals, while social workers deal with families. If the balance is unbalanced, it will be biased; especially now that there are so many problems in the family, once psychologists deal with individuals If there are too many people and they are dealing with individuals, what about the family? arrow_forward_iosunderstand more Powered by GliaStudio In fact, it can be said that such a judgment is almost completely deviated from the actual situation, and it can even be said to be completely ignorant of the counseling and counseling profession.
As long as any teacher who has been on telemarketing list the scene of education will agree that the family has a great influence on children, from the first-level tutor to the second-level tutor, they will spend a lot of time communicating with parents, in order to improve the quality of family education. As a third-level counseling psychologist, it is even more so. Personal work is definitely not only with the case, but also with all the systems in which the case is located, and conducts a lot of parental consultation to help parents grow. I once met with a parent twice a week, each time to help him learn to deal with the child's anger; I have also arranged for parents to meet with their child many times to resolve parent-child conflicts.
These are all things I do for the child's environment. effort. Perhaps these methods differ from the way social workers work, but school counseling still takes a lot of effort into the system. Just as social workers will have individual conversations with individual cases, professionals will have a lot of flexibility to adjust to the most appropriate way of working because of the practice site. If you think that "psychologists can only work as individuals, and social workers can only work as families" and adjust the ratio, in fact, not only underestimating the capabilities of the two majors, but also ignoring the significance of the existence of the academic counseling center.